← Back to home

Why Nepal’s Gen Z Keeps Protesting Even After Social Media Ban Ends

bysubhasrathodworld
Why Nepal’s Gen Z Keeps Protesting Even After Social Media Ban Ends

Kathmandu’s streets are restless again. The Nepal government may have rolled back its controversial social media ban, but that hasn’t silenced the country’s young voices. From university campuses to online forums, Gen Z remains at the heart of a movement demanding more than just internet freedom. Their slogans echo through the narrow lanes of the capital, and their anger feels raw, unpolished, and unyielding. The crisis, far from easing, appears to be entering a new and uncertain phase.

The Ban and Its Backlash

The government’s initial decision to ban major social media platforms was framed as a response to “misinformation” and “social instability.” For nearly two weeks, platforms like Facebook, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter) went dark. The move triggered outrage, especially among the country’s younger population who rely on these platforms not only for entertainment but also for networking, political mobilization, and even small-scale businesses.

When the ban was finally lifted after mounting pressure, many expected the protests to die down. Instead, rallies grew louder. “It’s not just about TikTok or Instagram,” said Anisha, a 21-year-old student from Tribhuvan University. “This is about being heard. They think shutting down apps will silence us, but our fight is bigger than that.”

What’s Driving the Youth?

Nepal’s Gen Z is unlike any generation before it. Raised in the digital era, they’ve seen the world through a global lens. They follow global protests in real time, watch political debates on YouTube, and connect with peers across borders. For them, free speech isn’t a luxury—it’s a baseline expectation.

Beneath the social media ban, however, lies a deeper frustration. The country is grappling with unemployment, political instability, and allegations of corruption. Young people feel cut off from opportunities, left behind by leaders who, in their view, cling to outdated politics.

“The ban was just the last straw,” said Karan, a 24-year-old software developer. “We’ve been patient for years, but nothing changes. Jobs are scarce, politicians fight among themselves, and we are supposed to stay quiet? No way.”

A Pattern of Political Unrest

Nepal’s history is dotted with political upheavals, from the civil war to the abolition of monarchy and the shift to a federal democratic republic. Each chapter carried promises of reform, but many of those promises remain unfulfilled.

Experts note that the current wave of protests taps into this legacy of unmet expectations. “The youth today were born after the monarchy, but they don’t feel the democracy they were promised,” said political analyst Ramesh Shrestha. “They see a political elite that is disconnected from their realities. This isn’t just about censorship—it’s about broken trust.”

The Government’s Dilemma

Officials insist they acted in the interest of national stability. The Ministry of Communications argued that the ban was a temporary step to curb “harmful content” and “false narratives” that could inflame unrest. Yet, critics see it as an overreach, a tactic designed to control rather than protect.

Now, with the ban reversed, the government faces a harder challenge: rebuilding credibility. A senior ruling party member admitted off the record, “We underestimated the anger. The youth aren’t afraid anymore. They want accountability, and that scares everyone in power.”

Social Media as a Lifeline

Ironically, the ban only underscored how crucial social platforms have become in Nepal’s social fabric. Small entrepreneurs who sold clothing and crafts on Instagram lost their main source of income. Activists who used TikTok to spread awareness found themselves suddenly cut off. Families separated by migration—common in Nepal, where many work abroad—struggled to connect easily.

The disruption highlighted a harsh reality: in today’s Nepal, internet access is not just leisure—it’s livelihood. “We were pushed back years in just two weeks,” lamented a young entrepreneur from Pokhara whose business depends on online sales.

What Lies Ahead?

The protests show no sign of fading. Instead, they are evolving, moving beyond Kathmandu into smaller towns. Students are organizing teach-ins, musicians are writing protest songs, and new alliances are forming between youth groups and civil society organizations.

Observers worry about escalation. Nepal’s fragile economy cannot withstand prolonged unrest. Tourism, a vital sector, is already seeing cancellations. Political leaders risk alienating a generation whose patience is thin and whose expectations are global.

At the same time, some see hope. “This could be the wake-up call our leaders need,” said sociologist Meera Koirala. “If they listen—really listen—this energy could be harnessed for reform rather than chaos.

Conclusion: A Turning Point

The lifting of the social media ban may have closed one chapter, but the story of Nepal’s youth uprising is just beginning. Gen Z isn’t merely demanding Wi-Fi—they are demanding a future. They want a political system that works, opportunities that match their education, and leaders who respect their voice.

Whether the government can rise to the occasion remains uncertain. For now, Nepal stands at a crossroads, with its youngest citizens leading the charge toward change. Their message is clear: silence is not an option.